[This is a "live post", meaning i will continue to edit both this top part and add or modify problems.]
The other thing I would mention, is that there are a lot of posts on this blog and it might be valuable for you to take the time to review them all and try to determine: which ones you understand, which ones are most important, and which ones are likely to be relevant for the midterm. Feel free to post questions, a summary, or related stuff here.
Also, on your "card" for the midterm, in addition to the Schroedinger wave eq., p as a derivative, a and a+ in terms as x and p, x in terms of a and a+, and p in terms of a and a+ (and as a derivative wi respt to x (ok, i said that twice), eig states: for inf sq well, 4 eig states for 1D HO, and the ground state for delta function, any thing else?, (and the boundary condition for the delta function) etc., please also include hbar in eV-seconds just in case there is a problem with actual numbers to work out.
I probably left some things out. This list is not comprehensive --just what popped into my head when I was wanting to mention that about hbar. Oh yeah. Length scales for each potential. (or inverse length scales).
Make sure you read all the problems and do as many as you can. You can ask questions.
Practice problems:
1. A particle of mass m (pomm) is in the ground state of an finite square well. Describe what happens if another square well of identical depth and width suddenly appears some distance away? As much detail as you can... what depends on what?...
Perhaps start with a grand statement regarding: what is the central issue of this problem, then get into details and how things depend on other things and so on.
2. A particle of mass m (pomm) is in the 1st-excited state of an finite square well. Describe what happens if another square well of identical depth and width suddenly appears some distance away? same comments as 1.
3. Consider a particle of mass m (pomm) in a 1D harmonic oscillator potential. Suppose that the particle is in a superposition state (mixed state) that is an equal combination of the mth and nth (energy) eigenstates. Calculate the expectation values of: x, x^2, p, p^2, V, T... (anything else?).
4. (More specific). For a pomm in a 1D HO, suppose state is an equal mix of |0> and |1> .
(all states are normalized). a) Calculate the expectation values of x and x^2 and thereby obtain delta x. (i hope this isn't too difficult.) b) Graph delta x (as a function of what?). Discuss, if it is interesting.
5. Suppose a pomm is initially (for t less than 0) in the ground state of a harmonic oscillator potential v=(1/2) k x^2 , and that at t=0 the potential suddenly morphs into a 2-delta function potential with two attractive delta functions of identical strength, one at x = +d/2, the other at x = -d/2 . Discuss what happens, and especially describe what you would find regarding the nature of that state function in the general vicinity of the origin (from like -3d to +3d or so) a long time later!
You may include a discussion of dependencies on strength, separation,...
b) DO the same thing for the case where one delta function is at x=0 and one is at x=+d. Does that make a difference. What might you find to be dramatically different, if anything?
Saturday afternoon additions:
6) Suppose that for t less than zero, an electron is in the ground state of an attractive delta function potential (adp) located at x=0, and that at t=0 two more adp's appear in addition to the first one), one at x= 2/k, the other at x=-2/k.
a) (quick calculation of expectation value at t=0+) Sketch the state function and V(x) at t=0+, and calculate the expectation value of the potential energy of the electron (at t=0+). How does it compare with the value of the expectation value of the potential energy of the electron before t=0?
b) (though question and essay) Describe what happens as a function of time after that. (You may focus on describing the time dependence of the "probability density".)
7. Consider a potential V(x) consisting of 2 identical attractive delta functions. When they are far apart there are two bound states, right? Show that the 2nd bound state ceases to exisit at a specific value of the ratio of the length scales k^-1 and d, where d is the separtation between the two delta functions and k^-1 is the length scale associated with the g.s. of a single delta function potential. (Is this true?) What is that ratio??
b) Describe in words several ways of looking at what happens as you approach this point from the part of parameter space in which there is an odd bound state. (to E, to k ...) (what is happening to the state???
8. (is phase important?)
Suppose you had one ensemble of sq well systems with a pomm in the state (psi_0+psi_1 )/sqrt(2), and another in the state (psi_0 + i psi_1 )/sqrt(2) . Could you distinguish these two cases via energy measurement? explain. how could you distinguish?
9, (phase) For an electron in a infinite square well, discuss the similarities and differences between the state: sqrt(2/L) Sin(2 pi x/L), (the 1st excited state), and the state which is the absolute value of that. Could you distinguish these by energy measurement (of separate ensembles of each)? Discuss that? Are the energy expectation values the same or different? Discuss other similarities or differences and end with a cogent paragraph, imagining that you ar the teacher of 139a, that explains the meaning and significance of phase in QM.
--
10. In 1D QM, which is easier: to be given the potential and asked to find the ground state, or to be given the ground state and asked to find the potential?
oh, i just remembered two more problems (closely related to each other)
11. Sketch and calculate the (transcendental) equation that would allow you to obtain the ground-state energy and wave-function for the half infinite harmonic oscillator (1D).
12. Sketch and calculate the (transcendental) equation that would allow you to obtain the ground-state energy and wave-function for the half infinite square well (1D).
(Is it clear what you are expected to do? Can anyone suggest a better way to phrase these questions?)
Do we need questions in other categories for balance? What are we leaving out?
Friday, May 8, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hello,
ReplyDeleteI'll just leave this here.
http://phys139.freeforums.org/
1-6 mostly focus on time evolution of the state function and, also, in some of them, expectation value calculations. This is very important, and it is easy to make up a lot practice problems on that, but please be sure to also take the time to look at the practice questions on other topics and review other areas.
ReplyDelete3 and 4 have a hard-core computational part, 1,2, and 5,6 are more conceptual I think. The 1st part of 6 is a little different in that the computational part is at t=0 only and so does not involve time evolution of the state function, as most of the other do.
Time evolution of the state function is critically important and you will be tested on your mathematical and conceptual understanding of that, but it is not the only thing.
7 is a bound state calculation problem.
8 and 9 have to do with phase.
10 asks about the relationship between a ground state and the potential of which it is the ground state.
I will try to add a few more later today to balance things out.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHow much calculation is expected for #1 and #2? Is it reasonable to try and find |C_0|^2 and |C_1|^2 for this kind of a problem? So far I've got (non-normalized) wavefunction solutions defined piece-wise, along with a time-dependent term for t >= 0. Then there's the expansion of eigenstates for t >= 0 with the time-dependent term, but I haven't solved for any C_n values.
ReplyDeleteI've written the oscillation period (the sloshing of the wave function between the two potentials) is primarily related to the separation width, and to a lesser extent, the initial energy of the particle. However, no real mathematical statement quantifying this...should I go further?
Someone asked this elsewhere, but I don't see the answer here. Is the "card" allowed for the test a sheet of paper or a 3x5 card?
ReplyDeleteHere's my stab at the expectation value of x for problem 3, just wondering if anyone else is going about this in a similar fashion.
ReplyDeletehttp://people.ucsc.edu/~egarzali/midterm.3.jpg
I used this as a reference:
http://quantummechanics.ucsd.edu/ph130a/130_notes/node177.html#example:HOexpectx01
Are solutions going to be posted? I can work these problems, but I need a reference to make sure I'm doing them correctly.
ReplyDeleteFor 1 and 2, trying to calculate anything associated with the actual eigenstates is folly. You need to figure out how to visualize the composition of the state after t=0 without computing the states. I think we have discussed this and perhaps it has been on a HW for the gs #1). The difficult part is to see how to make the problem very simple. There is an important concept in these problems (1 and 2) that we will use later in the quarter.
ReplyDeleteJust bring the things we discussed on a card or a piece of paper. No worked problems. You can discuss content here if you are not clear on that. (Maybe start by referring to the above quick summary.)
There will be no solutions posted. The idea was/is: if you worked a problem and you are unsure about it, or some aspect of it, you can post something here, though it is beginning to get a little late for that.
Edolfo, and everyone else: I would like to strongly encourage you to use beta or "a" instead of carrying all those hbar's, m's and omega's around. Those are like open pairs of scissors. Accidents can be prevented by zipping them up in a nice beta or "a". Length scales make sense. Multiple parameters tend to look like giberish, at a glance, and tend to get garbled in multiple step problems. And they slow you down and make your exponentials messy and complicated looking.
ReplyDeleteI'm just sayin...
Oh, and your approach looks good, i think. (I had some browser viewing problems.)
ReplyDeleteJusten said: I'm having a problem with #11, since all I can think of it as a half-gaussian. Hey maybe I just figured it out.
ReplyDeleteZack: Well, but what should psi(x) be at x=0??
Considering the stationary ground state of a multi-potential configuration such as two finite potential wells (not the propagating situation of problem 1) where there are two peaks in the wave function associated with each well, is there a characteristic length scale associated with this state? If so what would it be? It seems like there would only be a length scale associated with the peak at each well, and it doesn't make sense to me to combine those values in any way. Yet, it seems like the expectation value of x^2 would be centered in between the two wells and there would be a resulting delta x value that we could call a length scale, but it seems like it would get very large if we pulled the potential wells apart, which is condradictory from the limit as the distance between the wells goes to infinity. So, I guess what I'm asking is what is the length scale of a two potential well system? Any ideas?
ReplyDeleteJerome, Very thoughtful questions. I think that you are right that your intuitions don't quite make sense for that problem. This is a pathological question and won't be on the midterm. You do know how to do 1 and 2 though, right?
ReplyDeleteI think that x^2 gets huge, as you say, but means nothing, as you said.
I do understand 1 and 2 (I'm pretty sure anyways). I get problem 1 being approximately (not exactly) the superposition of states 0 and 1, and problem 2 being approximately (not exactly) the superposition of states 2 and 3. I presume for these problems the length scale is that for the initial state at t=0 although I'm not confident about this. I also think that the period of oscillation is proportional to the distance between the potential wells since delta E is inversely proportional to this distance. Any other stuff to consider about these two problems?
ReplyDeleteHoping to get some feedback from the hive:
ReplyDeleteExpected value of x^2:
http://people.ucsc.edu/~egarzali/midterm.3.xx.jpg
Delta x calculation:
http://people.ucsc.edu/~egarzali/midterm.4.jpg
Similar?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHey I don't know how to answer #1 and #2. How do we know that it is approximately the superpisition of psi0 and psi1 for #1 and superposition of psi2 and psi3 for #2?
ReplyDeleteWilson found a complete solution to #12 in bloody detail here
ReplyDeletehttp://www.che.ilstu.edu/standard/che460/misc/460PinWell.pdf
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletetry drawing the states and adding them together. You will see that Psi0 and Psi1 will add to equal the original Psi(x,0). same with Psi2 added with Psi3.
ReplyDeleteabove comment was for sulimon....
ReplyDeleteCan I suggest we attach an "e" at the end of your acronym "pomm" giving us "pomme" which then allows the interpretation that we are really talking about apples. I mean, that is what we are talking about, right?
ReplyDeletedefinitely! What about pomme de terre? Where does that fit in?
ReplyDeleteGetting late, but concerning #10, unless there's a trick, all we've been doing is calculating or jotting down ground states according to certain potentials. (Still a tedious calculation if you ask me, but doable.) YET, for a given ground state, it seems like the 'behavior' of the potential is very easy to visualize. It also seems like there is no real calculation for the potential, if it is just graphed straight from the ground state wave function. Grinding out details may be tricky; I don't know.
ReplyDeleteAn electron whose probability density peaks in NY at dinner time?
ReplyDeleteMyque may be on to something there. Basically, i think you are saying 10 seems inscrutable. I think that is a good (first) insight. (and I am goin to sleep now)
ReplyDeletePS. Maybe pomme de terre could refer to bound states?
PPS. Oh, and someone sent an email about this. 3 and 4 are, you know, time dependent, right?
yes but that doesn't effect expectation values, right? since the time dependent part is a complex exponential that goes away when multiplied by the conjugate...
ReplyDeletemaybe pomme de terre should refer to the states of the earth's gravitons
ReplyDeleteOr to be a little more ancient, we can refer to the particle of mass m as μίλο τηϛ γής
ReplyDelete